Unions NSW
Home  |  Contact  |  Feedback  |  Sitemap
Search

About Us
*About Unions NSW
*About Unions
*Who's Who

Information Centre
*Catalogue
*Labour Review
*Ask Neale
*Book a cottage @ Currawong Beach
*Labor Links

What's Going On?
*Events
*Circulars
*Todays Meetings
*Minutes

Annual Reports
*Latest Reports
*Past Reports


Unionsafe

LaborNET

ACTU
printer-friendly version
Policy Labour Review, issue no. 168

WorkChoices: Reform Options for Labor

By Anthony Forsyth

Kim Beazley's announcement that Labor will abolish Australian Workplace Agreements if elected to office next year has added new impetus to the workplace policy debate. But while the ALP's new billboard ads scream that they will "rip up" Work Choices, more flesh is needed on the bones of Labor's industrial relations policy.

. Early experience based on the first few months of operation of the Work Choices legislation suggests several clear avenues for workplace reform under Labor.

There is already a growing body of evidence that the new agreement-making framework is resulting in deleterious outcomes for workers. In late May, the Office of the Employment Advocate revealed to a Senate committee the findings of a sample analysis of around 5 per cent of AWAs lodged in the first month of Work Choices. This showed that all AWAs had removed at least one "protected" award condition, while 16 per cent overrode all of the protected conditions. 64 per cent of the AWAs took out leave loading, 63 per cent penalty rates, and 52 per cent shift loading. More recently, it has emerged that the Office of Workplace Services is investigating almost one quarter of workplace agreements which are suspected to be in breach of the Fair Pay and Conditions Standard.

The current debate over whether provision should remain for statutory individual agreements (like AWAs) largely misses the point. As Woodside Energy has recently shown, employers can obtain workplace flexibility through common law employment contracts. The real issue is what form of minimum standards both individual and collective workplace deals need to comply with. With awards likely to be virtually obliterated by the time Labor is re-elected, there will be little room to revive the "no disadvantage" test as it operated in the past. Instead, agreements should have to meet a modified version of the test, requiring that workers are (overall) no worse off in comparison with an expanded set of minimum employment standards. Arriving at a sensible balance between fair and decent working conditions and the productivity needs of business should be one focus of Labor's alternative system of workplace bargaining.


  • Go to the article at Australian Policy Online

  • Contact Details

    Name : Neale Towart
    Position : Librarian
    Telephone : 02 9264 1691
    Facsimile : 02 9261 3505
    Email : n.towart@unionsnsw.org.au

    view all articles in current issue | view all issues | view latest issue


    Home   |   Contact   |   Feedback   |   Sitemap   |   Privacy Statement

    © Unions NSW 2001.
    Unions NSW
    Level 3, 4-10 Goulburn St,
    Sydney NSW 2000
    Ph: (02) 9881 5999 Fax: (02) 9261 3505

    URL: http://council.labor.net.au/labor_review/168/update1682.html
    Last Modified: Wednesday, 08-Nov-2006 16:11:15 EST

    Unions NSW is proudly created, designed and programmed by
    Social Change Online for Unions NSW

    Social Change Online Workers Online Unions NSW
    LaborNET